Low credit from mini version vs prior

Message boards : Number crunching : Low credit from mini version vs prior

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile Feet1st
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 1755
Credit: 4,690,520
RAC: 0
Message 55386 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008, 14:26:55 UTC

Well, a portion of the issue is the disparity between claim and granted credit. So, when I turned HT off, I narrowed that gap significantly. But, I agree, I was using HT before mini, so I'm not proving much here.

Just exploring the thought that L2 cache may be one way mini might be running differently, and introducing such a credit difference. We know from past discussions that L2 cache, or lack thereof, seemed to be why many AMD CPUs don't seem to run as high a RAC as a similar Intel CPU. This was true before mini came on the scene, so I am just testing the extension of that theory.

We know the old app was L2 cache sensitive. This seems to say the cache was rather near full, or at least says L2 cache preferred exceeded the size on many AMD CPUs. So, if the L2 cache usage increased just slightly, it could cause lots of new waiting for memory access. And hence the lower credit.
Add this signature to your EMail:
Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might!
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/
ID: 55386 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Greg_BE
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 5691
Credit: 5,859,226
RAC: 0
Message 55390 - Posted: 29 Aug 2008, 17:35:41 UTC

Hi guys, just saw a blurb in another thread about hyperthreading and that it slows BOINC projects.
ID: 55390 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : Low credit from mini version vs prior



©2025 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org