can someone tell me what the difference is between

abinitio_norelax_homfrag_129_B_2icpA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_4626_7597_0

and

abinitio_norelax_homfrag_129_B_1u5zA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_4626_7597_0

thanks

can someone tell me what the difference is between

abinitio_norelax_homfrag_129_B_2icpA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_4626_7597_0

and

abinitio_norelax_homfrag_129_B_1u5zA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_4626_7597_0

thanks

They are running against different proteins, and (I'm not so positive about this part) I think they are using the same approach to solve the structure of the two proteins.

One is studying
2icpA
and the other is studying
1u5zA

...and these two proteins could be rather dramatically different size and models for each could take dramatically different runtime. This is why I always have to word carefully when I talk about credit calculations. The time per model of these two tasks should not be compared, and is not averaged in the calculation of credit per model. Each is averaged on it's own.

---

Rosetta Moderator: Mod.Sense

can someone tell me what the difference is between

abinitio_norelax_homfrag_129_B_2icpA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_4626_7597_0

and

abinitio_norelax_homfrag_129_B_1u5zA_SAVE_ALL_OUT_4626_7597_0

thanks

They are running against different proteins, and (I'm not so positive about this part) I think they are using the same approach to solve the structure of the two proteins.

One is studying
2icpA
and the other is studying
1u5zA

...and these two proteins could be rather dramatically different size and models for each could take dramatically different runtime. This is why I always have to word carefully when I talk about credit calculations. The time per model of these two tasks should not be compared, and is not averaged in the calculation of credit per model. Each is averaged on it's own.

that's what I thought, but wanted to make sure